Legal Opinion

Staub v. Eastman Kodak Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 5, 1999PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

726 A.2d 955 (1999)

320 N.J. Super. 34

Joseph STAUB and Dorothy Staub, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, Alcon Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Inc., Alcon (Puerto Rico), Inc., Lafayette Pharmaceutical, Inc., and Lafayette Pharmacal, Inc., Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued December 1, 1998.

Decided April 5, 1999.

Wayne D. Greenstone, Newark, for plaintiffs-appellants (Greenstone & Greenstone, attorneys; Mr. Greenstone, on the brief).

Thomas J. Alworth and George A. Joseph, of the Chicago bar, admitted pro hac vice for Kirkland & Ellis, Chicago,…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Steinberg v. Chicago Medical SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Tigg v. Pirelli Tire Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Wade v. Danek Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  4. Stevens v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Quinn v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2012

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API