Legal Opinion
Norman v. Norman
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 26, 2000No. 99-1519PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lavenski R. Smith, Justice.
Robert A. Norman (“Robert”) appeals an order of the Garland County Chancery Court denying his motion seeking recovery of fees and expenses from attorney C. Burt Newell. Robert alleges the fees and expenses are litigation costs he incurred opposing Newell’s representation of his ex-wife Josephine. In Norman v. Norman, 333 Ark. 644, 970 S.W.2d 270 (1998) (Norman I), this court held Newell was disqualified to represent Josephine due to a conflict of interest. Following remand, Robert filed a “motion for judgment” directly against Newell. The trial court found that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hodges v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Stephens v. Arkansas School for the BlindSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Myrick v. MyrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Koonce v. MitchellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Norman v. NormanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Faulkner v. Arkansas Children's HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Clayborn v. Bankers Standard InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Mississippi River Transmission Corp. v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Nielsen v. Berger-NielsenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Norman v. NormanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.