Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Christensen
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtRaker, J.
This case concerns the statute of limitations and whether the commencement of a class action suspends the applicable statute of limitations as to asserted members of the class who would have been parties had the suit been permitted to continue as a class action. We are presented with two issues. First, in a matter of first impression before this Court, we must determine whether, and under what circumstances, the pendency of a putative class action tolls the statute of limitations for the members of the putative plaintiff class who are not named plaintiffs in the action. We shall affirm the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Steinberg v. Chicago Medical SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Chardon v. Fumero SotoSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Haas v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Tigg v. Pirelli Tire Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Kumar v. DhandaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Prince George's County v. LongtinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Elat v. NgoubeneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.