Legal Opinion

Prisk v. City of Poulsbo

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 13, 1987No. 9254-9-IIPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReed, C.J.

The plaintiffs, Gary R. Prisk and Olympic Crest Development, seek reversal of a trial court order dismissing their challenge to the constitutional validity of development fees imposed by the City of Poulsbo. The plaintiffs also seek reversal of judgment upholding the validity of the City's utility connection charges. We affirm as to the utility connection charges, but reverse the judgment for development fees.

In 1981 the plaintiffs purchased approximately 14 acres of land in the City of Poulsbo, upon which they proposed to build a 172-unit condominium complex. The plaintiffs' predecessors in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. South Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass'n v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hillis Homes, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Orion Corporation v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Teter v. Clark CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Barrie v. Kitsap CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Montez v. J & B RADIATOR, INC.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Public Utility District No. 2 v. Comcast of Washington IV, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Bohn v. WaddellArizona Tax Court · 1990
  4. Irvin Water District No. 6 v. Jackson PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Harrington v. Spokane CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API