Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Spokane County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 23, 2005No. 22837-1-IIIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

114 P.3d 1233 (2005)

Alan HARRINGTON, individually and dba Harrington Construction, Petitioner,

v.

SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, Respondent.

No. 22837-1-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Eight.

June 23, 2005.

Stanley R. Schultz, Attorney at Law, Liberty Lake, WA, Stacy A. Bjordahl, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.

Martin D. Rollins, Spokane County Prosecutor's Office, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.

SWEENEY, A.C.J.

¶ 1 Standing to seek judicial review of a land use decision generally requires the petitioner to exhaust all…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Presbytery of Seattle v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Amren v. City of KalamaWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Amren v. City of KalamaWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Crosby v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nickum v. City of Bainbridge IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. Nickum v. City of Bainbridge IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. Buechler v. Wenatchee Valley CollegeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. Kailin v. Clallam CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Kailin v. Clallam CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API