Legal Opinion

Public Utility District No. 2 v. Comcast of Washington IV, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 13, 2014No. 70625-0-IPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*34¶1 Pacific County Public Utility District No. 2 (hereinafter District) permitted Comcast of Washington IV, Inc., CenturyLink of Washington, Inc.,1 and Falcon Community Ventures I, LP, d/b/a Charter Communications (collectively Companies), to attach their communications equipment to its utility poles pursuant to agreements with the Companies. However, at the beginning of 2007 the District revised its rates and instituted new nonrate terms and conditions, which resulted in significant cost increases to the Companies. After the Companies refused to pay the District at the new rates, declined to…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Evolocity, Inc. v. Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  2. Pub. Util. Dist. No. 2 of Pac. Cnty., Mun. Corp. v. Comcast of Wash. Iv, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  3. Hon. Kelli Linville, Res. v. State Of Wa. Dept. Of Retirement Systems, App.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. Edna Allen v. Dan And Bills Rv ParkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  5. Satwant Singh And Dhaliwal Real Estate, Llc v. Convington Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API