Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Irvin Water District No. 6 v. Jackson Partnership

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 15, 2001No. 19244-0-IIIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

— This is a dispute between real estate developers and Irvin Water District No. 6 over connection fees. The District provided the developers with water for fire and construction purposes. Later it substantially increased the connection charges. It did so before the developers actually applied for service and tendered the connection fees. The primary question before us is whether the District was committed to the connection fees in place when *117it first provided water to the developers. We have concluded that the District is not bound under any legal or equitable theory to supply water at the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Central Washington Bank v. Mendelson-Zeller, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Buell v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Covell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Klinke v. Famous Recipe Fried Chicken, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Landmark Development, Inc. v. City of RoyWashington Supreme Court · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harberd v. City of Kettle FallsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  2. Harberd v. City of Kettle FallsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. Lane v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Lane v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. IRVIN WATER DIST. v. Jackson PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API