Legal Opinion

Alvarado v. City of Port Hueneme

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 9, 1982No. Civ. 62917PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POTTER, Acting P. J.

Plaintiffs Fernando Alvarado and Huberto Franco appeal from the order of the superior court denying their “Re quest for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 473 and Request that a Trial de Novo be Ordered” after a judgment had been entered upon an arbitrator’s award pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.23. At the conclusion of plaintiffs’ case on January 22, 1981, the arbitrator granted a nonsuit. The following day he signed an award in favor of defendants and served it upon the parties by mail. The award was received by the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Tregambo v. Comanche Mill & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
  5. In Re Marriage of ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Maynard v. BrandonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Herbert Hawkins Realtors, Inc. v. MilheiserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. MOGHADDAM v. BoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Demirgian v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Bhullar v. TayyabCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API