Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bhullar v. Tayyab

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 17, 1996No. E014456PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHLI, J.

Plaintiff Karambir S. Bhullar (seller) sued defendant Zafar Tayyab (buyer) for damages arising from the unsuccessful sale of a liquor store to buyer. The buyer cross-complained on the ground that the seller had suppressed a material fact in connection with the sale. The seller appeals from a judgment in favor of the buyer on the cross-complaint for material misrepresentation; the buyer appeals on the ground the trial court erred in failing to award him attorney fees.

Facts

Seller owned a liquor store from December 1987 to April 1991. After some meetings or negotiations, buyer…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Flynn v. GortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Crampton v. TakegoshiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Morin v. ABA Recovery Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Demirgian v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Phelps v. StostadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Smith v. Rae-Venter Law GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Gibson v. BobroffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Poulson v. OFACKCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. Gibson v. BobroffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API