Legal Opinion

Ponke v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1915No. Docket No. 28PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Wayne; Mandell, J. Case by Frank Ponke against the Detroit United Railway for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment in the sum of $500 for injuries claimed to have been received by him on October 26, 1912, while standing on the back platform of one of the defendant’s cars when it was struck by another car going in the same direction. It is claimed that as a result of the collision he was thrown against the dividing rail, which broke off, and in consequence of the injuries suffered he was confined to his bed for a period of five weeks; that he did not go to work until January 3, 1913, and for two months after the accident he suffered pain; that during the time he was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fike v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Gardiner v. CourtrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Druck v. Antrim Lime Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Silverstone v. London Assurance Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. McGary v. Buick Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Simmer v. Cutter's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Debuhr v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API