Debuhr v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentMiller, J.
(dissenting) — I am unable to agree with the majority opinion herein and respectfully dissent. The only error assigned is the giving of instruction 5, quoted in the majority opinion. I do not think that said instruction was erroneous. Accordingly, I would affirm.
As I read the majority opinion, it holds that instruction 5 is erroneous for three reasons, to wit: (1) a defendant may not invoke the no-eyewitness rule; (2) instruction 5 gives defendant the benefit of affirmative proof rather than a presumption ; (3) the testimony of plaintiff and the physical facts render the no-eyewitness rule…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Looney v. Metropolitan RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Durning v. HymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Yarnell v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Marchetti v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Lunde v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.