Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 20, 2016No. 08P3396; A149009PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASELTON, S. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment, after a trial to the court, convicting him of felony public indecency, ORS 163.465(2)(b), and imposing a sentence of life imprisonment without possibility of release or parole pursuant to ORS 137.719(1). In his principal brief, as well as a supplemental brief, defendant raises a variety of assignments of error. We write to address only defendant’s contentions that (1) the trial court committed an error of law apparent on the record, ORAP 5.45(1), in entering a conviction for felony public indecency, because his prior convictions were legally…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CivilCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. HorsemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. State v. Lara-VasquezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. State v. C. E. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  5. State v. RideoutCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API