Legal Opinion

Hofsas v. Cummings

California Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1904No. Sac. No. 1102PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This is an action to quiet title. Plaintiffs claim as grandchildren and heirs at law of Rebecca Cummings, deceased. The defendants are sons of Rebecca Cummings, and deraign title through a deed of trust executed by their mother. The action was commenced after the death of Rebecca Cummings, and was founded upon the view of the plaintiffs that the deed of trust was void. The trial court so held and refused its admission in evidence. From the judgment which followed in favor' of plaintiffs the defendants appeal.

The deed of trust was a conveyance to the son, William Cummings, upon certain trusts,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of FairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Estate of FairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Carpenter v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lauricella v. LauricellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. In Re the Estate of PeabodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. In Re Estate of SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Sacramento Bank v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. In Re Estate of WillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API