Sacramento Bank v. Montgomery
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an action to quiet title to certain real property in the city and county of San Francisco in the possession of defendants.
The court found that plaintiff is not and never has been the owner of said lot, or of any interest or estate therein, and gave judgment for defendants. Plaintiff has appealed from the judgment.
Both parties claim under R. H. McDonald, who was the owner of the property on the first day of September, 1891.
The plaintiff claims under an attachment, judgment, and execution sale of the property, in a proceeding against said R. H. McDonald, and the defendants by virtue of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hahn v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Matter of the Estate Op Bernard NewManCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- In Re the Estate of FairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Reily v. LancasterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Estate of DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Miller & Lux Inc. v. SecaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Crouch v. H. L. Miller & Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- In Re the Estate of PeabodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- In Re Estate of SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.