In Re Estate of Spreckels
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing a partial distribution of the estate of a deceased person. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
Claus Sprecbels died testate on the twenty-sixth day of December, 1908, leaving as his surviving heirs his widow, Anna Christina Spreckels, four sons, John D., Adolph B. , Claus A., and Rudolph Spreckels, and a daughter, Emma C. Perris. His will was admitted to probate in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco on the ninth day of January, 1909, and letters testamentary were duly Issued to the executors named, who were his sons Claus A. and Rudolph. As will appear, the will undertook to make devises and bequests to these two sons as trustees upon certain declared trusts.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Manice v. . ManiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Savage v. . BurnhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- In Re the Estate of FairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Lockbihler v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Vanderpoel v. . LoewNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Salmonski v. BardzinskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Torregano v. TorreganoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.