Legal Opinion

Estate of Fair

California Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1902No. S.F. No. 2871PublishedCited by 19 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. William M. Pierson, and George E. Crothers, for James S. Angus and Thomas G. Crothers, Appellants. Garret W. McEnerney, and Robert Y. Hayne, for W. S. Goodfellow, Appellant. Van R. Paterson, for Herman Oelrichs, Jr., et al., Minor Beneficiaries, Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

This is an appeal by Angus et al., named as executors and trustees in the will of .James G. Fair, deceased, and by certain other parties, from a decree of distribution distributing a large amount of the personal property of the estate to the three children of the deceased, Charles L. Fair, Theresa A. Oelriehs, and Virginia Fair Vanderbilt, who are his next of kin and only heirs at law, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The will of the deceased and all matters to be considered are fully set forth in the opinions of this court in the former case of the Estate of Fair, 132 Cal.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kalish v. . KalishNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Roberts v. CareyNew York Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gardner v. City National Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Estate of PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Estate of TroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Sacramento Bank v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. In Re Estate of McCurdyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API