Legal Opinion
In Re the Estate of Fair
California Supreme Court
Decided April 30, 1901No. S.F. No. 1491PublishedCited by 92 opinions
APPEAL from a decree of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco partially distributing the estate of a decedent. Charles W. Slack, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This is an appeal from a decree of partial distribution.
Upon the former decision of this case, Mr. Justice McFarland rendered the following opinion, which is now adopted as the opinion of the court upon the questions therein discussed: —
"It seems to be necessary, at the expense of brevity, to state the fifteenth clause of the will here in full. By the preceding clauses a large number of legacies in money are given to various persons, consisting mainly of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Tilden v. . GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Hawley v. JamesCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
- In re Estate of WalkerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Lockbihler v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Gilman v. . ReddingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- In Re Estate of BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Campbell-Kawannanakoa v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.