Legal Opinion

Depue v. Travelers' Ins.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1909No. 98PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHFRSON, District Judge.

1. Tbe plaintiff’s action is based upon a policy of accident insurance whereby the defendant agreed to pay him a certain sum of money if his mother, Mrs. Sarah M. Hope, should lose her life as the result of “bodily injuries effected directly and independently of all other causes, through external, violent and accidental means * * ⅜ while in a passenger elevator.” It' is conceded that she died from bodily injuries such as are described in the quoted clause, but it is denied that they' were inflicted while she was “in a passenger elevator.” The facts upon which…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ætna Life Ins. v. VandecarCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  2. Northrup v. . the Railway Passenger As. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Preferred Acc. Ins. v. MuirCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1904
  4. Anable v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
  5. King v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. Continental Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Wright v. ætna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926
  3. London Clothes, Ltd. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Turner v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  5. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. California Cotton Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API