Legal Opinion

King v. Travelers Insurance

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 6, 1897PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Action on insurance policy. Before Judge Harris. City court of Floyd county. June term, 1896.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

King sued the Travelers Insurance Company upon a policy of accident-insurance. The defendant admitted a liability for $ 125 and no more; while the plaintiff contended that it was liable for double that amount under the following clause of the policy : “ If such injuries are sustained while riding as a passenger in any passenger conveyance using steam, cable, or electricity, as a motive power, the amount to be paid shall be double the sum above specified.”

The only question presented is, whether the company is liable under the double-indemnity clause above quoted. The plaintiff was injured…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Northrup v. . the Railway Passenger As. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Turner v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  2. Wilmarth v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Depue v. Travelers' Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Nichols v. Commercial Travellers' Eastern Accident Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  5. National Life Insurance Co. of United States v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API