Anable v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On motion to enter' judgment on a special verdict.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Reed, J.
This is a motion to enter judgment upon a special verdict. The question presented is whether upon this verdict the plaintiff is entitled to á judgment for $20,000 or to a judgment for only $10,000.
The defending company had written a policy of insurance upon the life of Eliphalet N. Anable, the husband of the plaintiff, for the benefit of the plaintiff. The husband died from injuries received at Asbury Park while attempting to board a train on the New Jersey Central railroad.
The insurance contract contained a provision for single insurance, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Van Bokkelen v. Travelers' InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Tooley v. Railway Pass. Assur. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Illnois · 1873
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wilmarth v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Depue v. Travelers' Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1909
- Goldman v. Commercial Travellers Eastern Accident Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- National Life Insurance Co. of United States v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
- Quinn v. New York Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.