Legal Opinion

Cavanaugh v. Richichi

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 10, 2007No. AC 27296PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

In this matter involving a property dispute, the defendant Robert W. Bloom 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Willis Cavanaugh. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly found that (1) a deed for the subject property was delivered to the plaintiff with the requisite intent of transferring title and (2) a resulting trust was created. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural history, as set forth by the court in its memorandum of decision, are relevant to the defendant’s appeal. “The…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Wren v. MacPherson Interiors, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  3. McCook v. CoutuConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. Lomartira v. LomartiraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  5. Young v. YoungConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. KingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. Salce v. WolczekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API