Legal Opinion

Wren v. MacPherson Interiors, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 23, 2002No. AC 19575PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FOTI, J.

The defendants, MacPherson Interiors, Inc.1 (MacPherson), Robert Roth, Roger Roth and Robert Allred, appeal from the judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, Clifford Wren and Barbara Wren, rendered after a hearing in damages on the plaintiffs’ breach of contract claim. The defendants claim that the court improperly (1) awarded damages based on the evidence adduced at the hearing in damages, (2) denied their motion to open the judgment and (3) denied their renewed motion to open the judgment. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The court found the following facts. On October…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Kim v. MagnottaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. Rumbin v. Utica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. Office of Consumer Counsel v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  5. Aubin v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. SkiddConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  2. Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. Merritt v. FaganConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. Schwartz v. MilazzoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  5. Berube v. NagleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API