Legal Opinion
McCook v. Coutu
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 22, 1993No. 11273PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court setting aside and nullifying two deeds she claimed granted her an interest in the plaintiff’s residence. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly concluded that (1) the legal effect of the first deed was subsequently nullified, (2) there was no delivery of the second deed, (3) her recording of copies of the deeds did not constitute a valid recording of the deeds, (4) the deeds were of no legal effect, and (5) she did not satisfy her burden of proof on her counterclaim. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- S & S Tobacco & Candy Co. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Botsford v. MorehouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1823
- Gruss v. MiskinisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- French v. GraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1816
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. PerezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Cavanaugh v. RichichiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Young v. YoungConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Cerny v. Household Realty Corp., No. 394804 (Nov. 14, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
- Edwards v. Tierney, No. Cv94-0357475s (Feb. 16, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.