Legal Opinion

Lomartira v. Lomartira

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 29, 1970PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThim, J.

The decisive question on this appeal is whether a deed executed by the plaintiff was legally delivered to the defendant.

The assignment of error concerning the court’s refusal to find certain facts has not been briefed and is therefore treated as abandoned. Monahan v. Montgomery, 153 Conn. 386, 389, 216 A.2d 824. The finding discloses the following facts. The plaintiff acquired a one-half interest in certain Branford real estate by deed dated March 17, 1955, and recorded on March 21, 1955. On March 18,1955, she executed two deeds, each covering this identical one-half interest, whereby in one…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Monahan v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  2. McDermott v. McDermottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  3. Merrills v. SwiftSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1847
  4. Porter v. WoodhouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  5. Wiley v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McCook v. CoutuConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  2. Cavanaugh v. RichichiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. Hamilton v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1992
  4. Cerny v. Household Realty Corp., No. 394804 (Nov. 14, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
  5. Edwards v. Tierney, No. Cv94-0357475s (Feb. 16, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API