Legal Opinion

People v. Thornton

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1984No. B001161PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUDOF, J. *

Statement of the Case

In an information filed by the District Attorney of Los Angeles County, Samuel Paul Thornton (herein appellant) was charged with possession for purposes of sale of a controlled substance, to wit, phencyclidine, in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11378.5. He was found not guilty of the principal offense and appeals from the judgment of conviction of the lesser included offense of possession of a controlled substance in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11377, subdivision (a).

Statement of Facts

The facts which form the basis of this…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Stone v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. HutchinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. ComptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People v. SuticCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. People v. HamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. HendricksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. BonillasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Keener v. Jeld-Wen, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. GreenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API