People v. Thornton
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUDOF, J. *
Statement of the Case
In an information filed by the District Attorney of Los Angeles County, Samuel Paul Thornton (herein appellant) was charged with possession for purposes of sale of a controlled substance, to wit, phencyclidine, in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11378.5. He was found not guilty of the principal offense and appeals from the judgment of conviction of the lesser included offense of possession of a controlled substance in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11377, subdivision (a).
Statement of Facts
The facts which form the basis of this…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Stone v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. HutchinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. ComptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. SuticCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. HamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- People v. HendricksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. BonillasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Keener v. Jeld-Wen, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. GreenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.