Legal Opinion

People v. Hendricks

California Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1987No. Crim. 23420PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

This is an automatic appeal (Pen. Code, § 1239, subd. (b)) from a judgment of death under the 1978 death penalty law (id., § 190.1 et seq.).

As will appear, we conclude that the judgment must be affirmed as to guilt and the special circumstance findings must be upheld. We further conclude that a gross error in connection with the sanity hearing compels us to vacate that verdict and to set aside the judgment as to penalty. The trial judge discharged the jury, empaneled another jury to determine the issue of sanity, and when the latter was unable to reach a verdict, committed the…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Zant v. StephensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. California v. RamosSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Payne v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. People v. FryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. WhartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API