Stone v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
That no criminal defendant should be twice forced to bear the risk of conviction for a single offense is a basic precept of our system of criminal justice. From this deceptively simple premise is derived much of the complex, rapidly expanding body of law implementing the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy.
*507The murder case at bar presents four issues: (1) whether we should give effect to the informally expressed, albeit unequivocal, intent of the jury to unanimously acquit this defendant of the charge of murder; (2) whether the double jeopardy prohibition against…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by174 opinions
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. MickeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
169 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.