Legal Opinion

Keener v. Jeld-Wen, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 2009No. S163430PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

We granted review to address issues concerning a trial court’s polling of a civil jury pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 618 (hereafter section 618) after rendering a verdict. This statute provides that if “more than one-fourth of the jurors disagree” with a verdict upon polling, “the jury must be sent out again” for further deliberation, “but if no disagreement is expressed, the verdict is complete and the jury discharged from the case.” (Italics added.) We conclude that a juror’s silence at polling, brought about by the trial court’s failure to poll that…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. PartidaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Plotnik v. MeihausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Taylor v. Nabors Drilling USA, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. People v. AnzaloneCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Myers v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API