Legal Opinion

People v. Compton

California Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1971No. Docket Nos. Crim. 15654, 15655PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether the trial below was barred by the constitutional prohibition against placing the defendant twice in jeopardy for the same offense. (Cal. Const., art. I, § 13.) We conclude that the plea of double jeopardy was valid pursuant to our decision in Curry v. Superior Court (1970) 2 Cal.3d 707 [87 Cal.Rptr. 361, 470 P.2d 345]; therefore the judgment must be reversed and the information dismissed.

This case was brought to trial three times. In Ventura Superior Court action No. CR 7871 defendant was charged with committing lewd and lascivious acts…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. ValentiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Curry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Paulson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. BoyetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. BurgenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. FuiavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API