Daniel v. Carolina Sunrock Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s claims of wrongful discharge and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Plaintiff did not appeal the summary judgment order as to her tortious interference with . contract claim.
“Summary judgment is properly granted ‘if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.’ N.C.G.S.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Coman v. Thomas Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Sides v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Waddle v. SparksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wagoner v. Elkin City Schools' Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Jackson v. Blue Dolphin Communications of North Carolina, L.L.C.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2002
- Moore v. City of CreedmoorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Fieldcrest Cannon, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Sandra THEARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GLAXO, INCORPORATED, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.