Legal Opinion

Coman v. Thomas Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 26, 1989No. 491A88PublishedCited by 190 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages from defendant for wrongfully terminating his at-will employment. The trial judge dismissed the action upon defendant’s motion pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The North Carolina Court of Appeals affirmed, and upon appeal to this Court, we reverse.

This being a dismissal pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), we look to the allegations of plaintiff’s complaint. Essentially, the complaint alleges that plaintiff began working for defendant, a North…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Harless v. First National Bank in FairmontWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by190 opinions

  1. Kulch v. Structural Fibers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Gantt v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Hughes v. BedsoleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  5. Martin Marietta Corp. v. LorenzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API