Legal Opinion
Moore v. City of Creedmoor
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided September 5, 1995No. 939SC1073PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN, Judge.
Plaintiffs James and Gracye Moore (plaintiffs or the Moores) appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants the City of Creedmoor (the City), Police Chief Ralph D. Seagroves (Seagroves or the Chief) and former City Commissioner Vance Douglas High (High or Commissioner High). As discussed herein, we find plaintiffs’ assignments of error regarding their claim of malicious prosecution in the main persuasive, but conclude the remainder cannot be sustained.
*32Pertinent facts and procedural information include the following: Since 1947, plaintiff James Y. Moore…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Madewell v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- David Evans v. Patrick BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Moore v. City of CreedmoorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- Murray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Epps v. Duke University, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Moore v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.