Legal Opinion
Lehto v. Underground Constr. Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 20, 1977No. Civ. 39882PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTT, J.
Rodney Allan Lehto appeals from the dismissal of his complaint against his former employers, Underground Construction Company (hereafter Underground) and Piombo Construction Company (hereafter Piombo), after the sustaining of their demurrer, without leave to amend.
The principal issue raised is the applicability of the 100-day statute of limitations, Code of Civil Procedure section 1288, 1 to an action alleging a breach of duty of fair representation by a union in an arbitration proceeding involving the employer. We conclude that the statute of limitations applicable is Code of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- O'MALLEY v. Wilshire Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Karen Margetta v. Pam Pam CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Khaligh v. Hadaegh (In Re Khaligh)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- DIAL 800 v. FesbinderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Thibodeau v. CrumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Kelley v. Corrections Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.