Legal Opinion

Thibodeau v. Crum

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 19, 1992No. H008203PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CAPACCIOLI, Acting P. J.

After arbitrating numerous construction deficiencies with the general contractor on their single-family home, plaintiffs asserted contract and tort claims against the subcontractor who constructed the driveway. Defendant subcontractor argued that the action was barred by application of the doctrine of res judicata, based upon the prior arbitration award. The court below rejected the defense of res judicata, conducted a trial, and entered judgment for plaintiffs.

On defendant’s appeal, we conclude that the action is indeed barred by res judicata and reverse.

Factual…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Kriegler v. Eichler Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Sutphin v. SpeikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Jorgensen v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. DKN Holdings LLC v. FaerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Jeremiah W. Holder v. Carla R. Holder, Jeremiah W. Holder v. Carla R. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Khaligh v. Hadaegh (In Re Khaligh)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. City of Oakland v. Oakland Police & Fire Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API