Legal Opinion
Karen Margetta v. Pam Pam Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 25, 1974No. 73-1720PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Per curiam
Upon being discharged from her job by Pam Pam, appellant filed a grievance against her union, 1 claiming that the discharge was without sufficient cause and in violation of the Collective Bargaining Agreement between the union and Golden Gate Restaurant Association, of which Pam Pam is a member. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the grievance was submitted to arbitration. After a hearing, the arbitrator made a final award against appellant.
Utilizing the provisions of § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act [29 U.S.C. § 185], appellant filed a complaint alleging Pam Pam had…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Donn L. Beriault v. Local 40, Super Cargoes & Checkers of the International Longshoremen's& Warehousemen's UnionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Dean M. Andrus v. Convoy CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Steinman v. Spector Freight System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Belanger v. MattesonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1975
- Edward T. Cannon v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. And Teamsters Local 710Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Lehto v. Underground Constr. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- George R. Williams v. Pacific Maritime AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.