Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. Davidson
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 10, 1987No. 85-1762PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
The first issue presented by this appeal is whether summary judgment was properly granted where the plaintiffs-appellants failed to file opposing affidavits to establish that a genuine issue of material fact existed regarding whether Dr. Davidson breached a duty of care owed to Marie Hoffman.
Civ. R. 56(E) provides:
“* * * When a motion for summary judgment is made and supported as provided in this rule, an adverse party may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of his pleadings, but his response, by affidavit or as otherwise provided in this rule, must set forth specific facts showing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bruni v. TatsumiOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Oliver v. Kaiser Community Health FoundationOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Mathis v. Cleveland Public LibraryOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Richards v. St. Thomas HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1986
3Cited by48 opinions
- Gaines v. Preterm-Cleveland, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Frysinger v. LeechOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Browning v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Hershberger v. Akron City HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Roberts v. HuttonOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.