Legal Opinion

Frysinger v. Leech

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1987No. 86-593PublishedCited by 138 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkus, J.

The physician contends: (1) a malpractice action accrues upon the patient’s discovery of the malpractice injury, despite the later termination of the professional relationship, and (2) a Civ. R. 41(A)(1) dismissal precludes a plaintiff’s reliance on R.C. 2305.19 to eliminate the limitations bar. We reject both those contentions, reverse the dismissal judgment, and remand the cause for further proceedings.

I

R.C. 2305.11(A) established the statute of limitations applicable to medical malpractice cases. At the time relevant herein, it provided:

“An action for * * * malpractice, including an action…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Oliver v. Kaiser Community Health FoundationOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Wyler v. TripiOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Lewis v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Williamson Heater. Co. v. RadichOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Chadwick v. Barba Lou, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by138 opinions

  1. Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Gaines v. Preterm-Cleveland, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Investors REIT One v. JacobsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Browning v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Omni-Food & Fashion, Inc. v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1988

133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API