Legal Opinion

Richards v. St. Thomas Hospital

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1986No. 85-1087PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

The very narrow issue presented by this appeal is whether appellants’ claims were timely filed. Because we find that Richards’ claim for medical malpractice was barred by R.C. 2305.11(A), we affirm the decision of the court of appeals.

R.C. 2305.11(A) provides in pertinent part that:

“An action for * * * malpractice, including an action for malpractice against a physician, * * * [or] hospital, * * * shall be brought within one year after the cause thereof accrued * * *.”

Thus, the determinative question on this appeal is the date Richards’ cause for medical malpractice accrued.

In Oliver v.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oliver v. Kaiser Community Health FoundationOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Holzwart v. WehmanOhio Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Browning v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hershberger v. Akron City HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Hoffman v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Lynch v. Dial Finance Co. of Ohio No. 1Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Anderson v. St. Francis-St. George HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API