Legal Opinion
Browning v. Burt
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1993No. Nos. 91-2079 and 91-2121PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The narrow issue in these consolidated cases is whether the negligent credentialing causes of action against SEMC for granting and continuing staff privileges to Dr. Burt (and Dr. Blue in case No. 91-2079) were timely filed pursuant to the applicable statute of limitations. Case No. 91-2079 involves additional issues concerning the court of appeals' reinstate*554ment of Lawrence Browning’s consortium claim against Dr. Blue and SEMC.10 Given the procedural disposition of these cases, the pertinent facts (where applicable) must be construed in a light most favorable to appellees who opposed the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- O'Stricker v. Jim Walter Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Oliver v. Kaiser Community Health FoundationOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Frysinger v. LeechOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Jacobs v. FrankOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Albain v. Flower HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Pena v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Natl. Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA v. WuerthOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Doe v. First United Methodist ChurchOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. St. Elizabeth Medical CenterOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.