Humane Society of Austin & Travis County v. Austin National Bank
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DOUGHTY, Justice.
This is a case in which petitioner, the Humane Society of Austin and Travis County, is challenging commissions and attorneys’ fees claimed by Austin National Bank as dependent executor of the estate of Mary Mayfield Gutsch, deceased. The probate court allowed the claims as submitted and disallowed all offsets claimed by the Humane Society, and the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed. Tex.Civ.App., 517 S.W.2d 323.
By its first three points of error the Humane Society contends that the Bank was guilty of self-dealing in investing the estate’s funds in its own certificates of deposit…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fitz-Gerald v. HullTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Slay v. Burnett TrustTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Johnson v. PeckhamTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Magruder v. DrurySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Rowe v. DyessTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Lesikar v. Rappeport, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
- Punts v. Wilson, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
- Kappus v. KappusTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- McLendon v. McLendon, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
- Ditta v. ConteTexas Supreme Court · 2009
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.