Ditta v. Conte
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Willett
The court of appeals held that this trustee-removal suit was barred by the four-year statute of limitations applicable to breach-of-fiduciary-duty suits. We disagree and hold that no statutory limitations period restricts a court’s discretion to remove a trustee. A limitations period, while applicable to suits seeking damages for breach of fiduciary duty, has no place in suits that seek removal rather than recovery. Accordingly, we reverse the court of appeals’ judgment that the case was time-barred and remand to that court for further proceedings.
I. Background
In 1987, Joseph and Doris Conte…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Huie v. DeShazoTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Kinzbach Tool Co. v. Corbett-Wallace Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- Perry v. CohenTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Williams v. KhalafTexas Supreme Court · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Rohrmoos Venture, Eric Langford, Dan Basso, and Tobin Grove v. Utsw DVA Healthcare, LlpTexas Supreme Court · 2019
- Wood v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2016
- in the Interest of Z.M.M., a ChildTexas Supreme Court · 2019
- Hollis v. LynchDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2015
- in Re Valliance Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.