Legal Opinion

Fitz-Gerald v. Hull

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1951No. A-2738PublishedCited by 277 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Griffin

In this cause the respondent herein, H. Winston Hull and Charles C. Green, as plaintiffs, sued the petitioner, James FitzGerald, as defendant, in a statutory action of trespass to try *42title to, and for an interest in, an oil and gas lease on certain described lands in Hockley County, Texas. For convenience, the lands will be called the Coble lands. Plaintiffs also alleged in detail a statement of their claims for recovery.

Generally, the allegations and proof show a joint venture entered into between respondents — plaintiffs below, and petitioner — defendant below — to acquire an oil, gas and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. White v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Lewis v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  3. James v. FulcrodTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  4. MacDonald v. FollettTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Mills v. GrayTexas Supreme Court · 1948

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by277 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. SwansonTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Norman v. Apache Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. Thigpen v. LockeTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Crim Truck & Tractor Co. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1992

272 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API