Legal Opinion
Lexington Hills Assn. v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 15, 1988No. Docket Nos. H000420, H000962, H001172PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AGLIANO, P. J.
An association of business entities (collectively “Coast,” coincidentally the same landowner/logger involved in Laupheimer v. State of California, post, p. 440 [246 Cal.Rptr. 82], which we also decided today) owns property in the Moody Gulch area of Santa Clara County and proposes to cut and remove trees from the property. The proposal has given rise to three lawsuits, each of which has, in turn, led to an appeal to this court. We consider the three appeals together. We conclude there is no legal impediment to the proposed logging. We shall affirm in one instance, reverse…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Bozung v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dinosaur Development, Inc. v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- McQueen v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Riverwatch v. Olivenhain Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Concerned McCloud Citizens v. McCloud Community Services DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Save San Francisco Bay Ass'n v. San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.