Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Concerned McCloud Citizens v. McCloud Community Services District

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 2, 2007No. C050811PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, J.

This case concerns an agreement for a contingent proposal for the sale and purchase of spring water, between McCloud Community Services District (District) and Nestle Waters North America, Inc. (Nestle). Concerned McCloud Citizens (Citizens), an unincorporated association formed for the purpose of protecting natural and cultural resources in the area of the town of McCloud in Siskiyou County, filed a petition for writ of mandate challenging the District’s approval of the agreement with Nestle because the District failed to conduct any environmental review pursuant to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Fullerton Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Save Tara v. City of West HollywoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Citizens for a Megaplex-Free Alameda v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Riverwatch v. Olivenhain Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Fair v. City of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API