Legal Opinion

Dinosaur Development, Inc. v. White

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 27, 1989No. A045078PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POCHÉ, Acting P. J.

The issue presented is this: If an agency of local government conditions its approval of a subdivision plan submitted by landowner A on the construction of a road from the nearest public thoroughfare to the adjacent landlocked property of landowner B, can A require B to shoulder a portion of the road’s construction costs? Our holding, which is limited to the peculiar situation presented, is that A does not have a cause of action against B for restitution.

Background

This appeal is from a judgment of dismissal entered after a general demurrer to a first amended…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. DoleSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. McCrackenSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Assn.California Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Blatty v. New York Times Co.California Supreme Court · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Durell v. Sharp HealthcareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Melchior v. New Line Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
  4. Buckland v. Threshold Enterprises, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Birchwood Land Company, Inc. v. KrizanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API