Legal Opinion
McQueen v. Board of Directors
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 18, 1988No. H003297PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AGLIANO, P. J.
1. Introduction
California state government officials are required “to make decisions with environmental consequences in mind” by the California Environmen tal Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq. 1 (Bozung v. Local Agency Formation Com. (1975) 13 Cal.3d 263, 283 [118 Cal.Rptr. 249, 529 P.2d 1017].) Public agencies should give at least preliminary consideration to the possible environmental effects of any proposed activity which is not exempt from CEQA by statute or administrative regulation. (§§ 15002, subd. (k), 15061, subd. (a); Code, §§…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Wildlife Alive v. ChickeringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Bozung v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- County of Inyo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- County of Amador v. El Dorado County Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- San Joaquin Raptor/Wildlife Rescue Center v. County of StanislausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Ass'n for Protection of Environmental Values v. City of UkiahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Azusa Land Reclamation Co. v. Main San Gabriel Basin WatermasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.