Legal Opinion

Miller v. Mt. Carmel Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 17, 1923No. 6 Div. 888PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit is by the widow of a deceased employee, and the certiorari is that at common law. Ex parte Central Iron & Coal Co. (Ala. Sup.) 95 South. 472. It seeks to review the action of the trial court in allowing compensation, under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, where death had resulted from the accident. • Gen. Acts 1919, p. 206.

The provisions of the act, as 'to notice, are:

“Every injured employee or his representative shall within five days after the occurrence of an accident give or cause to be given to the employer written notice of the accident and the employee if he .fails to give such…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Greek v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. State ex rel. Niessen v. District Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Central Iron & Coal Co. v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Steagall v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Galloway Coal Co. v. StanfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Grimes v. Stith Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Baughn v. Little Cahaba Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Nashville Bridge Co. v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  5. Ex Parte Big Four Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API