Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Central Iron & Coal Co. v. Pennington

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 18, 1923No. 6 Div. 756PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The certiorari was to review the decree of the circuit court in a cause brought under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Gen. Acts 1919, p. 206; Ex parte A. Diniaco & Bros, et al., 207 Ala. 685, 93 South. 388; Ex parte Majestic Coal Co. et al. (Ala. Sup.) 93 South. 728; Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford, 206 Ala. 447, 90 South. 803; Steagall v. Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co., 206 Ala. 488, 90 South. 871; and Ex parte Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co., 207 Ala. 531, 93 South. 425.

This act, being remedial in nature,, will he given a liberal construction to accomplish the purpose of the enactment. Ex parte…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Woodward Iron Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Independent Publishing Co. v. American Press Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Ex Parte Majestic Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Cloverdale Homes v. Town of CloverdaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  5. State ex rel. Patterson v. BatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. National Cast Iron Pipe Co. v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Connor v. State on Information of BoutwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  3. Cherokee Brick Co. v. BishopTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Ex Parte Big Four Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Miller v. Mt. Carmel Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API