Greek v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Petition by Fred H. Greek for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, opposed by the Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Company, employer. Judgment for petitioner, and the employer petitions for writ of certiorari. The statement of facts contained in, the record is not so specific as required by section 28 of the Compensation Act. 110 Ala. 115, 20 South. 57; 71 Ala. 461; 87 Atl. 86; 84 ISÍ.
Read the full summary
Petition by Fred H. Greek for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, opposed by the Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Company, employer. Judgment for petitioner, and the employer petitions for writ of certiorari. The statement of facts contained in, the record is not so specific as required by section 28 of the Compensation Act. 110 Ala. 115, 20 South. 57; 71 Ala. 461; 87 Atl. 86; 84 ISÍ. J. Law, 117, 86 Atl. 529; 89 N. J. Law, 150, 97 Atl. 723; 89 N. J. Law, 601, 99 Atl. 345; 101 Ala. 79, 14 South. 98; Honnold on Workmen’s Compensation, §§ 238-248. The finding does not support the…
1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.
By this application for the writ of certiorari, petitioner, the Sloss-Shef-field Steel & Iron Company, seeks to review the judgment of the circuit court in the matter of the petition of Ered II. Greek to be awarded compensation for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered by him by reason of an accident arising in the course of and out of his employment by the company.
It is contended in the first place that the trial court has failed to comply with the requirement of section 28 of the act (Acts 1919, pp. 206-239):
“This determination (meaning the determination of the trial court in case…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Woodward Iron Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Ex parte DickensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Reck v. WhittlesbergerMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- International Harvester Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Ex Parte W. T. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Mobile Liners, Inc. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Alabama Textile Products Corporation v. GranthamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Ex Parte ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.