Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Big Four Coal Mining Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 11, 1925No. 6 Div. 343PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit was under the Workmen’s Compensation Law against the Big Four Coal Mining Company and C. W. Ford.

Defendant Ford demurred to the complaint on the ground, among others, that written notice of death was not averred to have been 'given as required by statute, and the complaint was amended to meet said objection. All the parties in interest are before the court. L. & N. R. Co. v. Shikle, 206 Ala. 494, 90 So. 900.

The judgment was against the corporation and Ford. The former presents the petition for common-law certiorari, and Ford intervenes and assigns error. There is a bill of exceptions…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Woodward Iron Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Greek v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Ex Parte ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Ex Parte Majestic Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mobile Liners, Inc. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Alabama Textile Products Corporation v. GranthamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. Gulf States Steel Co. v. ChristisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Hamilton Motor Co. v. CoonerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  5. Bass v. Cowikee MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API